 | | Re: Peeron crosses 2000 inventory mark!
|
|
(...) Thanks for an excellent job, making Peeron a very valuable ressource for the community. I like the FAQ, very useful. I think it really covers many of the questions often asked. A few things I am missing though, are that when doing an inventory (...) (22 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Peeron crosses 2000 inventory mark!
|
|
"Martin Bruun" <Citembe@dkmail.zzn.com> wrote in message news:H5IEzp.8yK@lugnet.com... (...) set (...) alternative (...) That would only be true if doing an inventory from instructions, in which case one should state it somewhere in the inventory (...) (22 years ago, 14-Nov-02, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Peeron crosses 2000 inventory mark!
|
|
(...) I agree 100%, it is only an issue if it is done from instructions. (...) A MISB set is of course to prefer, but in my opinion inventories done from instructions are necessary to fill out the gaps. If someone afterwards verifies the inventory (...) (22 years ago, 14-Nov-02, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Peeron crosses 2000 inventory mark!
|
|
I think the issue below is one that bothered me a great deal doing inventories of the pirate sets. Many of those sets were done across the change in minifig heads from solid to hollow studs. That means that one MISB set 6285 could have part number (...) (22 years ago, 18-Nov-02, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Peeron crosses 2000 inventory mark!
|
|
(...) As a side-note on this issue, it's further complicated by the fact that it depends on when the 6285 was bought in the U.S. First-year U.S. sets DID have shooting cannons. I have a 6274 Caribbean Clipper and a 6276 El Dorado Fortress bought in (...) (22 years ago, 18-Nov-02, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
