 | | part database issues I have had to deal with —Robert Munafo
|
| | | I have just posted my current parts list in the message: (URL) might be of interest to this discussion group because it illustrates how to deal with several issues I had to overcome when I started dealing with parts identification (which I was doing (...) (25 years ago, 9-Jul-99, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: part database issues I have had to deal with —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | (...) The LDraw numbers aren't "always right", but new part files go through a serious review process before being published. There is a lot of discussion about this on ldraw.cad.dev. Also, the number stamped on parts isn't always right. This can (...) (25 years ago, 9-Jul-99, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: part database issues I have had to deal with —Sybrand Bonsma
|
| | | | (...) Hello Robert, Thanks for your list and your comments about identification of the pieces. It is very interesting. I have copied the names you used for the parts to my computer and will add them to the names I already have for parts, but that (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: part database issues I have had to deal with —Robert Munafo
|
| | | | (...) will (...) It might be obvious, but I'll just point out that most of those names either come from the technica registry: (URL) from the LDraw image catalog at: (URL) as you can see I rearranged the words to eliminate the awkward use of commas. (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| | | | |
