 | | part database issues I have had to deal with
|
|
I have just posted my current parts list in the message: (URL) might be of interest to this discussion group because it illustrates how to deal with several issues I had to overcome when I started dealing with parts identification (which I was doing (...) (26 years ago, 9-Jul-99, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: part database issues I have had to deal with
|
|
(...) The LDraw numbers aren't "always right", but new part files go through a serious review process before being published. There is a lot of discussion about this on ldraw.cad.dev. Also, the number stamped on parts isn't always right. This can (...) (26 years ago, 9-Jul-99, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: part database issues I have had to deal with
|
|
(...) Hello Robert, Thanks for your list and your comments about identification of the pieces. It is very interesting. I have copied the names you used for the parts to my computer and will add them to the names I already have for parts, but that (...) (26 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: part database issues I have had to deal with
|
|
(...) will (...) It might be obvious, but I'll just point out that most of those names either come from the technica registry: (URL) from the LDraw image catalog at: (URL) as you can see I rearranged the words to eliminate the awkward use of commas. (...) (26 years ago, 15-Jul-99, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
