Subject:
|
Re: Thoughts on Parts Taxonomy
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.db.brictionary
|
Date:
|
Mon, 13 May 2002 23:42:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3320 times
|
| |
|
|
In article <Gvx6oq.LLJ@lugnet.com>, "Dan Boger" <dan@peeron.com> wrote:
> I like the idea of better indexing, and would be happy to incorporate any new
> method into peeron - now someone just has to write it :)
I'd be happy to be a part of the development of such a system, but I
don't have the time to do it on my own or be in charge of a group
effort. So if someone volunteers to head up such a project, be sure to
post it here.
--
Mark D. McKean - The Quantum Panda - qpanda@quantumpanda.com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Thoughts on Parts Taxonomy
|
| I like the idea of better indexing, and would be happy to incorporate any new method into peeron - now someone just has to write it :) I know that indexing by a non-unique field (which is the part number) is a bad thing - it's just the easiest and (...) (23 years ago, 11-May-02, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
