To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.db.brictionaryOpen lugnet.db.brictionary in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Database / Brictionary / 227
226  |  228
Subject: 
Re: Thoughts on Parts Taxonomy
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.db.brictionary
Date: 
Mon, 13 May 2002 13:54:27 GMT
Viewed: 
3245 times
  
In lugnet.db.brictionary, Dan Boger wrote:

that part (and it's name) come from partsref - we try to use partsref names
whenever we can, unless it's for a part that isn't available as a dat yet.
But even for X numbers (our custom parts), we will eventually rename them to
whatever the LDraw guys come up with...

So the place you should push for a change here is partsref, not peeron :)

Hey, don't go blaming poor Partsref for something that's an LDraw
problem. ;)



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Thoughts on Parts Taxonomy
 
(...) doh, you're right. Everyone, please don't complain to Steve about the names in Partsref, just complain to Steve about the names in LDraw :P <G,D&R> (22 years ago, 14-May-02, to lugnet.db.brictionary)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Thoughts on Parts Taxonomy
 
(...) that part (and it's name) come from partsref - we try to use partsref names whenever we can, unless it's for a part that isn't available as a dat yet. But even for X numbers (our custom parts), we will eventually rename them to whatever the (...) (22 years ago, 12-May-02, to lugnet.db.brictionary)

9 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR