|
|
 | | Re: Peeron Guidelines
|
| (...) I agree that we should make sure that we have source of inventories whenever possible. We do try, and encourage others, to put such things in the comments section, but we haven't been pushing that... eventually, it would be nice to add a field (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jul-01, to lugnet.db.inv)
| | | | | Re: Peeron Guidelines
|
| (...) I'd like to echo the above sentiments. Most of us are unlikely to find MISB sets from 1980, but it would still be nice to have an inventory. . .and know that the inventory was not as reliable as one from an MISB set. (For example, I bought a (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jul-01, to lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Peeron Guidelines
|
| (...) Samuel, this a really important point. A great number of the inventories at Peeron are converted from other sources, and some are from years ago when world-wide AR levels were not as high, so it'd be nice to know just how much accuracy you can (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jul-01, to lugnet.db.inv)
| | | | | Re: Easiest way to get an inventory
|
| (...) For sets with a high percentage of normal-type pieces, I use ML-CAD - if there are instructions I'll build it, approximating position to save time, or for freestyle and the like, just a grid of pieces with multiples stacked. I have a horror of (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jul-01, to lugnet.db.inv)
| | | | | Re: Easiest way to get an inventory
|
| (...) Yeah, I have been doing them manually, too. A ton of parts lookups in partsref, let me tell you... I like databases since I can work with the keyboard and forget the mouse so I create inventories as a database (.dbf) and then save again as (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jul-01, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
|
