 | | Re: Disney actually did this with "Lion King" —Dave Schuler
|
| | | (...) Not sure about this--here's a snippet culled from the ABC News site (excerpted here for purposes of review and discussion and intending no challenge to the copyright status of that fine site!) "Both books have characters known as Muggles. They (...) (23 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Disney actually did this with "Lion King" —Mark Papenfuss
|
| | | | | In lugnet.castle, Dave Schuler writes: <snip> (...) <snip> (...) Funny you mention this, i remember seeing a story on a news show (dateline?)that there was a resturant named McDonalds, I think in Scotland, that is a very fancy, high class place. And (...) (23 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Disney actually did this with "Lion King" —Sean Forbes
|
| | | | | | (...) Actually, the story I heard was that as Fast food McDonald's moved into England and Scotland, the found a small restaurant near one of the desired sites named McDonalds. It wasn't too large or high class (I'll get to that later) but I also (...) (23 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Disney actually did this with "Lion King" —Peter White
|
| | | | | | (...) The Big M has had fast food franchising (burgers) to themselves in Australia. So the Big Mac is the Big Mac. Only recently have Burger King started expansion. But I believe someone local had rights to the franchise name 'Burger King'. When (...) (23 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Disney actually did this with "Lion King" —Jason Maxwell
|
| | | | (...) There was a long discussion on this in various Harry Potter web locations. Yahoo Groups is where I saw it. Anyway, they came up with multiple uses of the word Muggle going back at least 50 years. Jason (23 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Disney actually did this with "Lion King" —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) That's wild. I guess my question is whether there's an established context of use for the word, or if it's just out there in the world. I mean, I'm sure someone in history, while wielding his non-cumbersome sword, might have commented "Gee, (...) (23 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What's in a name? ( Potter, Plagiarism, and Trademark) —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes: If the word exists, that's one thing, but (...) Yes, Lego would have a case because it would create confusion in the public's mind. Less clear cut would be a recording company and a computer (...) (23 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What's in a name? ( Potter, Plagiarism, and Trademark) —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) Or, for example, a boy wizard and a boy wizard? 8^) Dave! (23 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
