Subject:
|
Re: Castle set rating curiosity
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Wed, 20 Dec 2000 17:12:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
729 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.castle, Bianca Nebab writes:
> No, it looks like someone (or a different someone in each case, possibly)
> cast a "0" rating for some--not all--of theCastle sets. I'm certainly not
> complaining, since everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But it is a
> curiosity without a context for the rating, since there don't seem to be any
> negative comments in the comments sections. In my own opinion, those are
> some of the best sets in LEGO period, much less just in the Castle theme.
> Some I would even rate as high or higher than Big Yellow (only 6085 is a bit
> too baroque for my tastes).
<snip>
Ya, I'd noticed this too, and wondered about it. My instinct is similar to
Dave's - that someone went through and marked down the castle "theme"for
some reason. Or possibly someone thought the aggregate rating on them was
too high, and marked them zero instead of their real opinion to bring the
rating closer where they thought the sets should be rated.
<shrug> I dunno. Maybe I should compensate by going and rating all the
non-castle sets with a zero... Nah, too much like work. ;)
'Tis a curious thing, no doubt.
James
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Castle set rating curiosity
|
| There are other themes that have this problem - a single "0" rating. Maybe instead of the 50% default to balance things - they should score things like they do in Olympic Ice skating/gymnastic competitions - throw out the highest and lowest scores. (24 years ago, 20-Dec-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Castle set rating curiosity
|
| No, it looks like someone (or a different someone in each case, possibly) cast a "0" rating for some--not all--of theCastle sets. I'm certainly not complaining, since everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But it is a curiosity without a context (...) (24 years ago, 20-Dec-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
10 Messages in This Thread: ![Castle set rating curiosity -Bianca Nebab (20-Dec-00 to lugnet.castle)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Castle set rating curiosity -Franklin W. Cain (20-Dec-00 to lugnet.castle, lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Castle set rating curiosity -Andy Lynch (20-Dec-00 to lugnet.castle)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Castle set rating curiosity -Bianca Nebab (20-Dec-00 to lugnet.castle)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Castle set rating curiosity -David Eaton (20-Dec-00 to lugnet.castle)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Castle set rating curiosity -Joel Morris (20-Dec-00 to lugnet.castle)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Castle set rating curiosity -Nathan McDowell (20-Dec-00 to lugnet.castle)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Castle set rating curiosity -Eric Joslin (27-Dec-00 to lugnet.castle)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Castle set rating curiosity -Todd Lehman (23-Dec-00 to lugnet.castle, lugnet.admin.database)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|