| |
(Momentarily x-posted to ".admin",
but re-dorected back to ".castle"...
You'll see why below. ;-)
In lugnet.castle, Bianca Nebab writes:
> I was just browsing through the Lugnet set guide.
> Lots of the Castle sets (6073, 74, 80, 81, 85 off the top of my head)
> have a single "0" rating. Is this the work of a rival theme mercenary,
> or does someone really not like these castles?
A single ZERO rating? Or a single "50(%)" rating?
IIRC, Todd has programmed the ratings to automatically have
a "balancing" initial/default rating of "50(%)", which is then
added to whatever other "real" ratings are given,
and the whole mess is averaged.
Isn't this right, Todd?
Thanks,
Franklin
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Castle set rating curiosity
|
| If you look at set 6073, you can see the short gray line at 50(%) that is the default rating ( I think ). I temporarily rated this set myself at 50%, and a reddish line appeared appended to the gray one. ( I then removed my rating, as I don't have (...) (24 years ago, 20-Dec-00, to lugnet.castle)
| | | Re: Castle set rating curiosity
|
| No, it looks like someone (or a different someone in each case, possibly) cast a "0" rating for some--not all--of theCastle sets. I'm certainly not complaining, since everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But it is a curiosity without a context (...) (24 years ago, 20-Dec-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Castle set rating curiosity
|
| I was just browsing through the Lugnet set guide. Lots of the Castle sets (6073, 74, 80, 81, 85 off the top of my head) have a single "0" rating. Is this the work of a rival theme mercenary, or does someone really not like these castles? binky --- (...) (24 years ago, 20-Dec-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
