Subject:
|
Re: Weapons
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Tue, 15 Aug 2000 00:37:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
533 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> I'd call the other a maul rather than a warhammer which generally look more
> like a hard-rock hammer with a hammer and reverse spike (but the one standard
> in medieval weaponry was that there was no standard). English longbowmen
> would plant their defensive stakes with mauls, and take a whack at the odd
> french knight who got too close.
Anthony called it a warhammer, so that's what I called it.
Hehe... you don't have to teach me about mauls, I own one! The one I have is
shaped like a very thick axe blade with a "hard-rock" type hammer on the back.
No spike, but just like you said, there is no one standard. It's just a tool
I have for chopping wood, but I have had to run off one or two French soldiers
who came around too close to my property with it. =]
And another thing... it is heavy!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Weapons
|
| I came up with a design for a mace for a priest minifig of mine some time ago. I used an antenna, a 1x1 brick w/ studs on side, and four 1x1 tiles w/ clip. Here's an illustration: "(URL) (24 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Weapons
|
| (...) a (...) Yeah, that was the mace I was refering to. The gear results in a great flanged mace. I'd call the other a maul rather than a warhammer which generally look more like a hard-rock hammer with a hammer and reverse spike (but the one (...) (24 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
