Subject:
|
Re: Ninja vs. "real" Castle (was: Re: More news on 2000 lineup!)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Wed, 10 Nov 1999 00:46:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
838 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.castle, Mike Stanley writes:
> Doyle <doylenelson@home.com> wrote:
> > I agree with what mike said on the interpretation, I did get the view that he
> > doesnt like the old castle themes too, so its just not mike on the loose here,
> ^^^^^^^^^^
>
> RUN FOR YOUR LIVES!!! Mike's on the loose!!!!!
ROFLOL!!! >D
I *would* read this at work - now everyone knows I'm weird, not just
speculating!!!
The images that ran through my head when I read this were far to graphic an
complex to repeat here. Lets just say I haven't laughed like that for a while
(gee...I need to get out more!!)
Pete Callaway
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
5 Messages in This Thread: ![Re: Ninja vs. "real" Castle (was: Re: More news on 2000 lineup!) -James Powell (9-Nov-99 to lugnet.castle)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Ninja vs. "real" Castle (was: Re: More news on 2000 lineup!) -Doyle G. Nelson (9-Nov-99 to lugnet.castle)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Ninja vs. "real" Castle (was: Re: More news on 2000 lineup!) -Mike Stanley (9-Nov-99 to lugnet.castle)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Ninja vs. "real" Castle (was: Re: More news on 2000 lineup!) -Doyle G. Nelson (9-Nov-99 to lugnet.castle)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|