 | | Re: Royal Knights treasure Carrier 6044 and others —Tamyra Teed
|
| | | well MR Leroy, Your sale posting doesn't belong in this group no matter what you're selling. Sale postings can ONLY go in market.buy-sell-trade. It doesn't belong at all in .castle, so don't jump on Ravi he was right in the first place. Read the (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Royal Knights treasure Carrier 6044 and others —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | I think trade posts _are_ OK(ish). It is only auction posts which are a no-no (?). Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Royal Knights treasure Carrier 6044 and others —Tamyra Teed
|
| | | | | | As I remember it.. if the Group charter agreed to allow some type of trading then it was ok.. I don't believe we have that understanding in .Castle, though I wouldn't mind if we did.. (Correct me on this if I'm wrong!) Though this isn't trade, this (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Royal Knights treasure Carrier 6044 and others —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) The LUGNET Terms of Use Agreement, (URL) no requirement one way or the other regarding the place of regular sales postings. Only auctions are verboten by the LTUA. However, it's generally considered good netiquette not to spam theme groups (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Royal Knights treasure Carrier 6044 and others —Ravi Mohan
|
| | | | (...) Ahh mookie-its just the way the average Ah Beng (Genus AHBENGUS SINGAPORENCIS SCAPIAN)sounds its a little joke when people who are capable of perfectly polite speech rather than Flowery speech use the lousy english usually sprinkled with (...) (24 years ago, 17-Mar-00, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Royal Knights treasure Carrier 6044 and others —Tamyra Teed
|
| | | | Well, I sure didn't see any :)'s after anything.. though if you take those words the way they are.. they are not nice.. Though as long as you are ok with it, that's fine with me :) Tamy (...) (24 years ago, 17-Mar-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Royal Knights treasure Carrier 6044 and others —Ravi Mohan
|
| | | | (...) i (...) holidays!!!I (...) SINGAPORENCIS (...) Well i sure hope he was meaning it the way i thought he was-the smiles would have cleared up a lot of trouble for all of us-i really did this cause i made a similar error quite recently with my (...) (24 years ago, 17-Mar-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Royal Knights treasure Carrier 6044 and others —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | (...) I think he was... (...) Don't worry, just try to word your posts so that people understand WHY the post doesn't fit or is inappropriate to that place. Otherwise they might feel accused and get hurt (I discovered that way too quickly). (...) (...) (24 years ago, 17-Mar-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Royal Knights treasure Carrier 6044 and others —Ravi Mohan
|
| | | | (...) Well this is the official Gov approved way my name is spelt (ie in my birth cert maybe i should change it to plain old ravi....) a desition follows soon.... (24 years ago, 18-Mar-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Royal Knights treasure Carrier 6044 and others —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | (...) LOL! I meant the lugnet setup, not your name ;-) I see you did change it... so I guess you got my point anyhow ;-) I need some sleep, sorry if I'm way out of it... :) -Shiri (24 years ago, 18-Mar-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | |
