Subject:
|
Re: Knights Kingdom sucks!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Sun, 20 Jul 2003 04:57:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
532 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle, Benjamin Medinets wrote:
> One last big negative. The theme lacked any type of realism. The castle
> was basicly built for looks, and not for any type of defense. The royal
> family, a knight, and a few soldiers defending against relentless hoards
> of barbarians....right!
Yet that's exactly the mix I preferred when I was 10. You have to let kids apply
their own logic here, and they are not yet interested in "realism". However I
don't think you could go wrong by making the castle look stronger.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Knights Kingdom sucks!
|
| (...) I have to agree with that. When I was young, Robin Hood and his crew always had this gigantic "hidden" fortress that was generally made to look like a short stump of an Ewok tree (which was enough that noone could ever find it), while the evil (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jul-03, to lugnet.castle)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Knights Kingdom sucks!
|
| (...) Hi Joshua, thanks for sharing your personal views on the theme. There is a lot to complain about with the theme. However, there was a chrome set in the theme with a dragon ... Dragon Rider (URL) not flashy, but definitely affordable. I thought (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jul-03, to lugnet.castle)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
