| |
Well - it was going to happen sooner or later due to the incredible reviews it
got early:
http://us.imdb.com/Title?0120737
Do you think it's justified? I think it's good, but is it really the # 1 movie
of ALL time?
Shawshank Redemption and other movies come to mind ...
-- Pawel
|
|
Message has 4 Replies:
 | | Re: LoTR # 1 on IMDB
|
| (...) It was a good movie. A solid, though flawed, interpretation of a book that is among the greatest masterpieces of literature ever produced. As a movie, the Fellowship of the Ring lacked the subtleties of emotion and sensitivity that sets a (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | Re: LoTR # 1 on IMDB
|
| (...) Yes, its well deserved…and its only gonna get better with the sequels. Mind you, the first book -IS- the slow one…it sets the pace and background for the next two!!! “Bigger than Star Wars” Indeed, --==RiçhärÐ==-- (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | Re: LoTR # 1 on IMDB
|
| (...) Modern movies tend to spike to the top of the list, because they're fresher in people's minds. I seem to remember, though, that they tend to settle down a little bit after time. Adrian (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | Re: LoTR # 1 on IMDB
|
| (...) It's just an initial reaction, based in part on enthusiasm. Yes, I enjoyed it (note that it is up for a Golden Globe for Best Picture already!), no it isn't the best movie of all time, but in my view it is only the first third of an (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
