Subject:
|
Re: Review of Knights Kngdom sets 6026, 6094 and 6095
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Sat, 25 Dec 1999 22:27:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
742 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle, Ed Jones writes:
> Forget to add the most important advancment: the instructions include
> semi-detailed instructions for alternate models!!! This is a great step
> forward for LEGO.
The only reason for any of these sets to enter my collection was to make 6091
(6098) larger and more complete. Add all that stuff to 6090 (x2) and I am on
my way to being content with the new castle line. Needs more bowmen and kings
men and barbarians to make it all it can be, but isn't that why we buy so many
of them?
Happy Building!
Aaron
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Review of Knights Kngdom sets
|
| <snip (...) <snip> I can see someone else noticed the inconsistancy from the box to the instructions. It would be nice if we (AFOL) had some clarification on the set number. You want a review? Of the castle? Ok.. you talked me into it. When I found (...) (25 years ago, 26-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
Message is in Reply To:
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
