 | | Re: Minimum distance?
|
|
(...) Hi Jaco, It has been a long time and I was not able to go to the URL listed above. I have reworked the minimum camera distance concept, and have realized the wisdom of Lars' camera placement use of vaxis_rotate..... Now I just change the (...) (20 years ago, 4-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Radiosity example (F1 Ferrari) once again
|
|
"Travis Cobbs" <tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com> wrote in message news:I4vn98.21q3@lugnet.com... (...) there. (...) sure (...) made (...) spectacular (...) I have used the anti-aliasing quite extensively, although just by using the defaults I've never (...) (20 years ago, 4-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Radiosity example (F1 Ferrari) once again
|
|
(...) After looking closely at the forklift image, I think the stair-step effect is happening due to POV-Ray's adaptive antialiasing algorithm. It's much quicker to render the image at the desired resolution with adaptive antialiasing enabled in POV (...) (20 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Radiosity example (F1 Ferrari) once again
|
|
"Nico Kaiser" <nico@siriux.net> wrote in message (...) Are you 100% sure about this? Usually the stair effect is caused by a lack of anti aliasing. Rendering the image at a huge resolution then doing a resize with proper resampling is more or less (...) (20 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Radiosity example (F1 Ferrari) once again
|
|
Am Sonntag, den 26.09.2004, 10:46 +0000 schrieb Jan Folkersma: (...) Well, I don't have a problem with "mixed" models with LGEO elements and standard parts. The big advantage of LGEO is, that the edges are rounded a bit, so you don't need the gap (...) (20 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Radiosity example (F1 Ferrari) once again
|
|
Mine look purhaps abit 'edgy' since I don't like to use the lgeo library. Too many parts are not available and if I combine them with the standard parts it don't look all that good. (2 URLs) first attempt>> This is my first attempt with Nico's (...) (20 years ago, 26-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Radiosity example (F1 Ferrari) once again
|
|
(...) Yours look good as well but the edges seem a little "jaggy". Are you using anti-aliasing? The good news is that Nico's setting are a snap to implement. -Orion (20 years ago, 25-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Radiosity example (F1 Ferrari) once again
|
|
Aaaarrghh! I thought my renderings were the bomb (URL) galery>> but now I've seen Nico's pictures, I guess I'll have to start all over! :) (20 years ago, 24-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Radiosity example (F1 Ferrari) once again
|
|
Am Donnerstag, den 16.09.2004, 12:09 +0000 schrieb Tim David: (...) Yes. But remove the lights as we're working with global illumination here. Ah, and if you like, you can replace the default floor with something better, try to set "ambient 0 (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Radiosity example (F1 Ferrari) once again
|
|
Hi Trevor, (...) The full resolution image is available at (URL) 11min + 4h13min (2 passes) on my Pentium 4) The LDR file is at (URL) like I forgot to upload it to the "mpd" folder where all my other LDR files are). Nico. (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
