Subject:
|
Re: memory for LGEO
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.ray
|
Date:
|
Fri, 29 Mar 2002 01:33:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
722 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.ray, Coby Bassett writes:
> In lugnet.cad.ray, Damien Guichard writes:
> > In lugnet.cad.ray, Jeroen de Haan writes:
> > > What is the minimum memory a computer needs to render a POV-file with
> > > LGEO-parts? 128Mb? 256? more?
> > > I know it depends on the size of the file, but is there a sort of guide for it?
> > > I need to know for the REND101 manual.
> > >
> > > Jeroen
> >
> > My computer has Win98se, 64Mb memory and I never encountered problems with
> > LGEO parts.
> > Probably 32Mb is sufficient for models below 1000 parts.
> > I estimate one could render all official lego models using only 32Mb.
> >
> > Damien
>
> I used to attempt Lgeo mania on my 32Meg Win95 machine, but could only
> manage a few dozen pieces before grinding the system into submission. (Ummm,
> not that the system submitted to actually rendering the picture, rather that
> it finally admitted defeat at that time.)
> Nowadays I have 256Megs and haven't yet produced a model that couldn't be
> rendered. This includes sets such as the the 1980 Auto Chassis (#8860) which
> weighs in at 662 pieces according to the Lugnet set DB. (And that's not even
> counting the additional shapes needed to construct hoses and rubberbands,
> and of course the obligatory checkerboard planes with chrome spheres also in
> the scene!) I've given my computer a few headaches now and then with some
> nasty recursion tests and all... but that's hardly fair, is it?
> In my experience, 32 megs is really pushing things, but otherwise Damien
> is right on. 64 megs should get most people by with LGEO, and anything above
> that is great.
> (BTW, I've never believed that stuff about more memory making POV-Ray
> render faster.)
I would like to point out a difference in thinking here.
64MB may be fast and good enough for rendering any complex/big model ALONE.
That being just the model with a simple grey floor or the building
instructions. Since I usely render my models with a scence I have noticed
that these do require more resources from my PC. So if you want to render
lego scenes then more memory is better.
AHui
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: memory for LGEO
|
| (...) I used to attempt Lgeo mania on my 32Meg Win95 machine, but could only manage a few dozen pieces before grinding the system into submission. (Ummm, not that the system submitted to actually rendering the picture, rather that it finally (...) (23 years ago, 28-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
