 | | Re: Adding to Catagory Group
|
|
(...) Here's a link to my MLCad.grp file: (URL) been meaning to share this for a while. It's much more finely granulated than the default MLCad groups. I even asked Michel if he could make it the default but alas nothing came of it. -Orion (16 years ago, 6-May-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Adding to Catagory Group
|
|
(...) Thanks for the info guys, I've only been building for about a week now and haven't set down and gone through all the tutorials yet. I've been having too much fun just building. I noticed in the thread link that Ducky had altered the names of (...) (16 years ago, 6-May-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Adding to Catagory Group
|
|
(...) (URL) (16 years ago, 5-May-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Adding to Catagory Group
|
|
(...) Sure. Right click on the treeview, and go to Parts Tree -> Tree Configuration. This opens a dialog box with all the treeview entries. Now just type in the name of the category, and the rule that matches it (to make a minifig category, enter (...) (16 years ago, 5-May-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Adding to Catagory Group
|
|
Is it possible to alter the catagory groups in MLCad? I'd like to be able to add groups/sub-groups to the list, for example a group that has all the minifig parts. (16 years ago, 5-May-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | MLCad.ini 2009-01 Update Now Available
|
|
Hi folks, I just updated the MLCad.ini file accordingly to the latest LDraw.org parts update 2009-01. The .ini file defines (among other thigns) the parts available in MLCad's minifigure generator. Download the file from my website: (URL) w. (16 years ago, 4-May-09, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Peeron_to_MLCad
|
|
Hi All I have developed a program called Peeron_to_MLCad. It's useful to simplify the initial phase of implementation of existing Lego sets. With Peeron_to_MLCad is possible to reduce drastically the time needed to select the parts and find the (...) (16 years ago, 4-May-09, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: bendable track
|
|
(...) Yeah, about that... I guess Willy and I were both thinking at some point that maybe bands and hoses aren't really so different that they require two distinct paths through the lsynth code. So we did a quick and dirty experiment with the (...) (16 years ago, 17-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: bendable track
|
|
(...) Hi Willy, Thanks for the explanation. I've never touched the STRING_BAND synthesis, so we'll have to let Don speak to this. Kevin (16 years ago, 15-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: bendable track [DAT]
|
|
(...) Upps! Looks like there is a gap in communication. Don started writing code which would allow using "bendable" and "band" constraints together. A first result can be seen in STRING_HOSE + STRING_BAND at: (URL) SYNTH BEGIN STRING_BAND 19 0 SYNTH (...) (16 years ago, 15-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: bendable track
|
|
(...) Hi Willy, "Spouse" bendables with treads? I'm not even married! LOL! I do not recognize the topic you are asking about. Kevin (16 years ago, 15-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: bendable track
|
|
(...) Hi Kevin, correct. It's easier to work this out in our mothertongue. If there are problems we get back to you. Just wondering: Is there progress in "spouse" bendables with treads? w. (16 years ago, 14-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: bendable track
|
|
(...) Hi Willy, Could you please translate this for me? I suspect that you are saying, yes, we can resolve this by personal email? Thanks, Kevin (16 years ago, 14-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: bendable track
|
|
(...) Ciao Christian, se mi mandi una mail personale e spieghi piú in dettaglio cosa ti serve forse ti posso aiutare. w. (16 years ago, 14-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | bendable track
|
|
Hello, is it possible to draw a bendable track with the new track and sprocket with lsynt (the one from the bulldozer)? thank you Cristian ___...___ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 4004 (20090413) ___...___ (...) (16 years ago, 13-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Mirror Building
|
|
(...) I'll do, but I think that SR3CAD is good to play with lego models... for building them I'm faster with MLCAD... I'm using Mlcad since 2005 by the way the author of sr3dcad is a member of ItLUG and I have the chance to meet him at every of our (...) (16 years ago, 31-Mar-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Mirror Building
|
|
(...) wow thank you I'll give it a try soon! thank you Cristian ___...___ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3978 (20090331) ___...___ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. (URL) (16 years ago, 31-Mar-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Mirror Building
|
|
"Travis Cobbs" <tcobbs@REMOVEgmail.com> ha scritto nel messaggio news:KHC7AF.n5s@lugnet.com... (...) hey, it really works.... and it was so easy too!!! probably I have done some mistake in the Mike's suggestion!! thank you very much! Cristian (...) (16 years ago, 31-Mar-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Mirror Building
|
|
(...) They should be fine if you use LDView to do the POV export, and make sure "Fix mirrored stud logos" is checked in the export options, and don't use LGEO parts. (Granted, that last requirement is annoying, but hopefully I'll get it fixed at (...) (16 years ago, 31-Mar-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Mirror Building
|
|
(...) SNIP (...) That is also the way I explained it. But we have to mention that with this technic the Logo on the studs are not correct on the mirrored part! cu mikeheide (16 years ago, 30-Mar-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
