Subject:
|
Re: bendable track
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.mlcad
|
Date:
|
Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:39:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
21568 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.mlcad, Willy Tschager wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.mlcad, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
> > In lugnet.cad.mlcad, Willy Tschager wrote:
> > > In lugnet.cad.mlcad, Cristian Sala wrote:
> > > > is it possible to draw a bendable track with the new track
> > > > and sprocket with lsynt (the one from the bulldozer)?
> > >
> > > Ciao Christian,
> > >
> > > se mi mandi una mail personale e spieghi piú in dettaglio cosa ti serve forse ti
> > > posso aiutare.
> > >
> > > w.
> >
> > Hi Willy,
> >
> > Could you please translate this for me? I suspect that you are saying, yes,
> > we can resolve this by personal email?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Kevin
>
> Hi Kevin,
>
> correct. It's easier to work this out in our mothertongue. If there are problems
> we get back to you.
>
> Just wondering: Is there progress in "spouse" bendables with treads?
>
> w.
Hi Willy,
"Spouse" bendables with treads? I'm not even married! LOL!
I do not recognize the topic you are asking about.
Kevin
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: bendable track [DAT]
|
| (...) Upps! Looks like there is a gap in communication. Don started writing code which would allow using "bendable" and "band" constraints together. A first result can be seen in STRING_HOSE + STRING_BAND at: (URL) SYNTH BEGIN STRING_BAND 19 0 SYNTH (...) (17 years ago, 15-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: bendable track
|
| (...) Hi Kevin, correct. It's easier to work this out in our mothertongue. If there are problems we get back to you. Just wondering: Is there progress in "spouse" bendables with treads? w. (17 years ago, 14-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
