Subject:
|
Re: L3P -check Messages and hold votes
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Fri, 17 Jul 2009 22:14:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
13696 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Willy Tschager wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Orion Pobursky wrote:
> > In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Andrew Westrate wrote:
> > > In lugnet.cad, Willy Tschager wrote:
> > > > IMHO it is high time to revise the entire L3P -check Messages page and set a new
> > > > standard for holding a part. Thoughts?
> > >
> > > This page definitely needs to be updated, if only to add text saying that
> > > planarcheck should be used instead for checking non-coplanar quads. I didn't
> > > see the lugnet post when that standard changed, and it's hard or impossible to
> > > find the new rules from the parts tracker. The l3p page should also have a link
> > > somewhere to that file format restrictions page you mentioned.
> > >
> > > Andy
> >
> > Actually, this page should probably be removed. The official library standards
> > are listed in one place:
> > http://www.ldraw.org/Article292.html#partsstandards
> > Any other documents are probably out of date.
>
> IMHO the page is quiet useful giving you a guideline when to hold a part and
> when not. You cannot expect a reviewer flicking through several pages to find
> out if the error he has spotted is reason enough to hold the part.
>
> To kickstart I'm gonna put down a list with the changes needed:
>
> * Planarcheck has to be used instead of L3P when checking for non-coplanar quads
> - http://news.lugnet.com/cad/?n=15016
Current version of DATHeader checks this.
>
> * Colinear check - http://news.lugnet.com/cad/?n=16258. As far as I remember
> this has been added to LDDP. Orion?
Current version of DATHeader checks this.
>
> * No prog checking for embedded POV-Ray code -
> http://www.ldraw.org/Article479.html
Coming version of DATHeader will also check for POV-Code.
>
> * Datheader checking for unofficial color numbers not listed in LDConfig.ldr
>
> * Datheader checking for main and edge colors -
> http://www.ldraw.org/Article512.html
>
> * CA-Header - http://www.ldraw.org/Article398.html As far as I know Chris is
> recoding the PT script which will lead to the PT rejecting part without a proper
> header
>
> Please help filling in.
Please see the document what DATHeader is testing for at
http://datheader.mikeheide.kilu.de/datheadertests.html.
Except the POV code test I think it is a complete list of things that got a hold
vote or at least not certified on the PT during the last two years.
cu
mikeheide
>
> w.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: L3P -check Messages and hold votes
|
| (...) IMHO the page is quiet useful giving you a guideline when to hold a part and when not. You cannot expect a reviewer flicking through several pages to find out if the error he has spotted is reason enough to hold the part. To kickstart I'm (...) (15 years ago, 10-Jul-09, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
