Subject:
|
Re: L3P -check Messages and hold votes
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:23:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
13690 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Orion Pobursky wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Philippe Hurbain wrote:
> > > - Overlapping polygons (No plans to add this as it would be nearly impossible
> > > due to the nature of the exceptions)
> > I think it could be done. But is it really necessary? Thresholds would need to
> > be defined too...
>
> I'm definately sure I don't want to add this because:
> - It's not an error, it's a warning
> - There are many cases where overlapping is acceptable (e.g. to cone/ring
> primitives) that sorting out the good from the bad would be extremely hard and
> in the end might generate an unacceptable number of false positives.
That's only true if the polygons are the same color. If they're different
colors, it's an error. I've seen official parts with overlapping polygons that
are different colors.
--Travis
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: L3P -check Messages and hold votes
|
| (...) I'll look into this. The !LICENCE check is case sensitive so unless you have exactly what's in the spec, it will complain. (...) The Lib Spec says that 3 decimal places is enough in most cases (4 for scalable primitives). This would be a (...) (15 years ago, 16-Jul-09, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
