Subject:
|
Re: Library Specifications for Canvas Parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Tue, 8 Jul 2008 11:39:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
7907 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Alex Taylor wrote:
> So...I'm working on the two tepee covers (this is gonna take a while... :-) and:
>
> - 'Cloth' (Peeron) or 'Canvas' (Bricklink) ?
Canvas - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canvas
> - thickness: 1LDU looks too thick to me. Have we settled on this, or is it
> still up for grabs? I'm trying 0.5LDU right now, which looks better.
I measured the Wagon Cover with a caliper rule (as I always do) and 0.4 mm
seamed to me much more appropriate than 0.2 mm.
> - each part as both a 'flat' version (for the BOM, I guess) and the conical
IMHO a flat version just for the BOM is overkill but I'd like to hear the PT
admin's opionion on this.
w.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Library Specifications for Canvas Parts
|
| So...I'm working on the two tepee covers (this is gonna take a while... :-) and: - 'Cloth' (Peeron) or 'Canvas' (Bricklink) ? - thickness: 1LDU looks too thick to me. Have we settled on this, or is it still up for grabs? I'm trying 0.5LDU right now, (...) (16 years ago, 7-Jul-08, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
