Subject:
|
Re: Library Specifications for Canvas Parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Mon, 7 Jul 2008 22:11:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
8388 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Travis Cobbs wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Alex Taylor wrote:
> > So...I'm working on the two tepee covers (this is gonna take a while... :-) and:
>
> > - thickness: 1LDU looks too thick to me. Have we settled on this, or is it
> > still up for grabs? I'm trying 0.5LDU right now, which looks better.
>
> A note on the thickness. If the part is BFC'd, then in theory there is no
> minimum thickness that is required to prevent rendering artifacts. In reality,
> you'll get artifacts on renderers that don't have BFC support if you go too
> thin. If you're using LDView with BFC enabled for testing, it might be good to
> test with BFC disabled in LDView, as well as test with other renderers such as
> MLCAD, L3Lab, and POV after L3P export.
>
> --Travis
Yeah, MLCad has rendering problems at 0.5LDU. Oddly, it seems to be able to
cope with a 0.25LDU thick sticker.
Alex
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Library Specifications for Canvas Parts
|
| (...) A note on the thickness. If the part is BFC'd, then in theory there is no minimum thickness that is required to prevent rendering artifacts. In reality, you'll get artifacts on renderers that don't have BFC support if you go too thin. If (...) (16 years ago, 7-Jul-08, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
