Subject:
|
Re: Library Specifications for Canvas Parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Mon, 7 Jul 2008 17:56:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
7658 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Alex Taylor wrote:
> So...I'm working on the two tepee covers (this is gonna take a while... :-) and:
> - thickness: 1LDU looks too thick to me. Have we settled on this, or is it
> still up for grabs? I'm trying 0.5LDU right now, which looks better.
A note on the thickness. If the part is BFC'd, then in theory there is no
minimum thickness that is required to prevent rendering artifacts. In reality,
you'll get artifacts on renderers that don't have BFC support if you go too
thin. If you're using LDView with BFC enabled for testing, it might be good to
test with BFC disabled in LDView, as well as test with other renderers such as
MLCAD, L3Lab, and POV after L3P export.
--Travis
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Library Specifications for Canvas Parts
|
| So...I'm working on the two tepee covers (this is gonna take a while... :-) and: - 'Cloth' (Peeron) or 'Canvas' (Bricklink) ? - thickness: 1LDU looks too thick to me. Have we settled on this, or is it still up for grabs? I'm trying 0.5LDU right now, (...) (16 years ago, 7-Jul-08, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
