Subject:
|
Re: Library Specifications for Canvas Parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Tue, 19 Feb 2008 02:14:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5267 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Michael Heidemann wrote:
| |
In lugnet.cad, Willy Tschager wrote:
|
| |
- As the “Canvas” is only useful in the fold version like the design of the part, it should not be modifyable like stickers (colors).
|
Actually, I think it should use color 16 and 24 for the canvas portion. LDraw
is partially about allowing people to build computer models of real world
creations, but it’s also definitely about allowing them to build computer models
that will never exist in real life. As such, I think people should have control
over the color.
| |
- Also we do not need an unfold version (mostly useless).
|
I agree here.
| |
- Unpatterned versions are only necessary if there is also a real unpatterned version.
|
I could go either way on this. I’d definitely say that if an unpatterned
version wasn’t too much extra work, it’s probably worth it, but that’s just me.
I definitely wouldn’t call it necessary.
| |
- There should be a new category.
|
Yes. Officially, the first word of a part description is required to be one of
the existing categories. The category list is maintained by the part tracker
admins, though, not the LSC.
--Travis
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Library Specifications for Canvas Parts
|
| (...) I think as follow: As the "Canvas" is only useful in the fold version like the design of the part, it should not be modifyable like stickers (colors). Also we do not need an unfold version (mostly useless). Unpatterned versions are only (...) (16 years ago, 17-Feb-08, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
