To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 3895
  Re: Contributor Agreement License details - updated version
 
(...) Actually I'm fairly certain the folks at Lego could easily devise a way to import a model file into LDD on a PC with NONE of the official Ldraw files installed. They could then generate a rendering in LDD and publish that on the internet, (...) (17 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: Contributor Agreement License details - updated version
 
(...) In that case I agree it wouldn't be a derivative work. I am becoming more and more convinced that an MPD isn't actually a derivative work. (...) If people are willing to go to the effort of making or using an alternate part library in order to (...) (17 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: Contributor Agreement License details - updated version
 
(...) don, you wouldn't have a model file at all without the parts library. at least not without extreme effort because of the missing visual feedback. I'll give you some codes: CM051P09.dat, HF300P09.dat, CM060P14.dat, CM053P03.dat, CM250P02.dat (...) (17 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: Contributor Agreement License details - updated version
 
(...) This is also not true. BlockCAD has its own part library, not at all connected to the LDRAW library, but BlockCAD *can* save a model in the LDRAW format, thereby making it possible to render a BlockCAD model with the LDRAW compatible programs. (...) (17 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: Contributor Agreement License details - updated version
 
(...) It's quite condescending to express the view that alternative libraries are created/used just 'in order to avoid writing ...'. All of those alternatives were in existance long before the 'license'. Actually it sounds more like ldraw.org is (...) (17 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: Contributor Agreement License details - updated version
 
(...) Now this is more along the lines of what I'd consider a derivative work according to the license, but only if their part file library actually includes ldraw primitive files, or text copied from the parts or primitive files. If they just (...) (17 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: Contributor Agreement License details - updated version
 
(...) Anders, I'm sorry to say this but all your comments to me in this thread have been very negative without offering anything positive in return (by way of suggestions for improvements for example). Don made some good points and through debate (...) (17 years ago, 6-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR