 | | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines —Jan Folkersma
|
| | | hello all, My compliments to Orion and his efforts to make the MOTM contest more fair. But I do wonder why there is a need for this. Have there been doubtful submissions in the past? My biggest puzzle however is the copyight issue. Steve, in reply (...) (20 years ago, 4-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines —Orion Pobursky
|
| | | | | (...) While I understand the desire to have all models publicly available, I respect the authors desire to keep his/her efforts out of the public domain. A great analogy of this is that you can go a museum and look at an exhibit, you can even take (...) (20 years ago, 4-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines —Jan Folkersma
|
| | | | | | (...) I think this analogy is not so great. The reason why we can't take things home from a museum is that things there are unique and in a museum more people can come see it. In the virtual world it's rather the other way around: things are not (...) (20 years ago, 4-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines —Orion Pobursky
|
| | | | | | (...) I still would like to respect the author's choice not to have the raw DAT code posted, it is after all his/her property. -Orion (20 years ago, 4-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | | (...) I agree (strongly) with Orion here. While I'd love to have copies of other people's LDraw files when voting for the contest, ultimately the decision to make the source of a model public should remain up to the author. -Tim (20 years ago, 4-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines —Kyle Beatty
|
| | | | | | | | (...) All I have to add is a 'me too' to Tim's thought. I'll never pay for a copyrighted .dat file but that doesn't mean that people don't have the right to keep the files they make private. Not to sidetrack further, but the matter becomes nastily (...) (20 years ago, 4-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | | | (...) I agree whole heartedly with Orion on this one. Just because I submit a model for a contest, should not mean that I give up ownership of the model. I'm pretty sure that I would give away the DATs for any models that I submit, but I'd like that (...) (20 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines —Ahui Herrera
|
| | | | | --snip-- (...) BEFORE this topic went public, there was discussion (within LDraw) about submitions from indiviudals that might later on want to make the models commercially avaliable. By submitting their LDraw files and making them public their (...) (20 years ago, 4-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines —Miguel Agullo
|
| | | | (...) Models can be copyrighted for different reasons, like: 1. They are commissioned commercially 2. They are sold by the creator 3. They belong to a larger copyrighted work (i.e. a book) While I respect copyrights (it comes with the age, it (...) (20 years ago, 4-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |
