 | | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
|
|
(...) LDLite do with a .txt file if it found it in an .mpd file? (...) I like this idea beter. LDAO and LDLite would pick it up and display it so people can read it if it was an errors.dat instead of errors.txt. -Tim Courtney ldraw.org Project (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
|
|
(...) each (...) of the (...) yet. (...) which is a Good (...) A/R?? (...) reason to have an (...) set (things (...) arms, etc. -- all (...) extra (...) And have you made a list of all those extra pieces, Todd? You can't expect people to do that on (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
|
|
(...) A/R?? (...) Good idea.. (...) Ok. (...) Wow! You have pointed out something very serious. Should there be things in the MPD splitters to catch something like that and not allow it to write to c:\ or c:\windows? -Tim Courtney ldraw.org Project (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
|
|
(...) That sounds like a really wise idea...and positively A/R, which is a Good Thing too. :-) And not only that (but related), there probably is a good reason to have an extras.dat file to codify the extra elements that come with a set (things like (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
|
|
Tim Courtney <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:199906151603.JA...omm.com... (...) Why not just an errors.dat file with lots of 0 comment lines? What would LDLite do with a .txt file if it found it in an .mpd file? Maybe it doesn't care what (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
|
|
(...) Then we should put an errors.txt file in the MPD's to denote each discrepancy in the official models. Especially since a lot of the decorated or sticker elements have not been modeled in LDraw yet. -Tim Courtney ldraw.org Project Coordinator (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
|
|
Tim: (...) Yes, assuming the directories exist. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw and 8.3
|
|
Steve: (...) No, but there are separate compilers for DOS, MS-Windows 95, and MS-Windows NT. (...) Depends on which compiler you used. (...) Nope. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
|
|
Since we appear to be using MPD for the Model Repository, I think its usefulness could be extended. Because of the patterned parts rule - if there isn't a decorated element for a set use the undecorated version - we will need a list of all errors in (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: IMPORTANT - [ldraw.org] Official Model Repository
|
|
Bram Lambrecht <braml@juno.com> wrote in message news:19990614.203348...uno.com... (...) The Particle Ionizer has that many levels, but I just named them d, e, f, g, h. Your way is fine with me, though, as it gives the most flexibility. -John Van (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
