 | | Re: MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
Hey Orion, Would it be possible for people without logins to at least be able to see the entries, even if they cannot vote? I had a login at one point, but tried all my normal usernames to no avail. Bruce (19 years ago, 5-Dec-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
--SNIP-- (...) OK. Cheers. I did think it was a bit strict but my reading of the rules was that it was a requirement. I'll email you a new version of my image. Thanks for the clarification. Tim (19 years ago, 5-Dec-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
(...) Yes that's exactly why. The way postnuke does user authintication involves generating an authorization key. Everytime you open a form it generates an auth key and when you click submit it passes the key along with the other form data. This (...) (19 years ago, 5-Dec-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
(...) 800x600 isn't a hard limit on size, your entry can be larger. This doesn't mean you can submit a 8000x6000 image but 1024x768 is fine. The same applies for the 150k limit (however the rules wording on this point seems to imply differently so (...) (19 years ago, 5-Dec-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
(...) Could it be because I opened two tabs - one with each of the categories - instead of working sequentially? When I tried again now, I was allowed to vote in the SOTM category. Play well, Jacob (19 years ago, 5-Dec-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
(...) Strange. I managed to vote in both (or at least I saw no errors to indicate otherwise). Tim (19 years ago, 5-Dec-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
(...) It looks like I was only allowed to vote in one of the two categories. First I voted in MOTM and got to a page saying "Thank you for voting". Second I voted in SOTM and got to a (similar) page saying "You are not authorized to carry out this (...) (19 years ago, 5-Dec-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
(...) I'm not complaining as I think it's a bit of a silly rule but this entry (URL) does not fit the rules I read (800x600 and <150k). Does this mean the rules have been changed and if so, can I submit a larger entry of my scene? Yours, Tim (19 years ago, 5-Dec-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
Oh wait: when I logon to LDraw.org first, I get no errors. Good work! (19 years ago, 5-Dec-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
(...) when i click the link I get: Fatal error: Call to a member function on a non-object in /usr/www/users/peero...pnuser.php on line 313 Good thing this is restarted again! Thumbs up! :) (19 years ago, 5-Dec-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
We're pleased to announce that voting for the December 2005 Model of the Month and Scene of the Month Contests is now open. Visit the voting page to cast your vote: (URL) inform me of any errors you may encounter. -Orion (19 years ago, 5-Dec-05, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.announce)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org MOTM/SOTM Relaunch
|
|
(...) Thanks that's fixed now. I had to enter all the winners in to the database by hand so I expect a few mistakes that lead to broken images. -Orion (19 years ago, 30-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org MOTM/SOTM Relaunch
|
|
(...) Yep, looks good. I did notice that the January 2000 MOTM entry has a broken link for its actual image while browsing, but all the others I looked at worked fine. --Travis (19 years ago, 29-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org MOTM/SOTM Relaunch
|
|
(...) Yeah, I think so as well. I had a problems with this on other similar pages. (...) Yes, it was first implemented for the March 2004 contest. (...) The different views are for the contest ballot only. Once an entry wins, I chase one view and (...) (19 years ago, 29-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org MOTM/SOTM Relaunch
|
|
I get the same error when I try to click on the voting page: (URL) It might dissapear when some entries are added... Btw, the guidelines of MOTM say that we should send in ldr, mpd or dats, and you will render them from three different angles.. Is (...) (19 years ago, 29-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org MOTM/SOTM Relaunch
|
|
(...) You found a bug in my code (not unexpected at all considering the size of the module). I've applied a workaround and everything should be visible now. -Orion (19 years ago, 28-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org MOTM/SOTM Relaunch
|
|
(...) site decorations) with this in it when I click on the most recent winners, and two columns of this when I search past winners. I'm logged into my ldraw.org account when this happens. --Travis (19 years ago, 28-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | LDraw.org MOTM/SOTM Relaunch
|
|
I'm pleased to announce the relaunch of LDraw.org's MOTM/SOTM contest. After writing a few thousand lines of code, the core functionality for the new contest and voting module finished. There's not a whole lot different visually but the archive (...) (19 years ago, 28-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.announce) !
|
| |
| | LDraw.org MOTM Status
|
|
It's been a while since the MOTM contest has been run and I feel that I owe an explanation to those who support me and LDraw.org. As some of you may know, I'm enlisted in the US Navy. Due to a combination of work schedule change, the planning and (...) (19 years ago, 23-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: James Jessiman Memorial Award for 2005
|
|
(...) congratulations Michi! your work on MLCad deserves all the imaginable tribute I can think of and it is always a pleasure and a honor to give you a little hand. bye, w. (19 years ago, 17-Aug-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: James Jessiman Memorial Award for 2005
|
|
(...) Well deserved indeed! Couldn't have done it without your effort! Jeroen (19 years ago, 16-Aug-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: James Jessiman Memorial Award for 2005
|
|
(...) I realy don't know what to say now .... I'm overwhelmed .... I would like to say thank you to the Jessiman Family, and of course to everyone who has downloaded and used MLCad in the past. Without you the MLCad wouldn't be that what it is (...) (19 years ago, 16-Aug-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: James Jessiman Memorial Award for 2005
|
|
Congratulations to Michael. Without MLCad I would not be making virtual models with the LDraw format. Thank you for all your work. Tim (19 years ago, 15-Aug-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: James Jessiman Memorial Award for 2005
|
|
(...) And that is a very good choice! The LDRAW format plus MLCad has really spread 'virtual Lego building' around the globe. MLCad really makes *real* Lego CAD affordable and attainable for everyone! Congratulations Michael! Well deserved. (19 years ago, 15-Aug-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: James Jessiman Memorial Award for 2005
|
|
(...) That's super-cool! Congratulations indeed to Michael! Dave! (19 years ago, 15-Aug-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | James Jessiman Memorial Award for 2005
|
|
The James Jessiman Memorial Award was established by the Jessiman Family to honor an individual who has contributed to the furthering of LDraw, the DAT format, and James' memory. This year, in consultation with the Jessiman's, the LDraw.org Steering (...) (19 years ago, 15-Aug-05, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.announce) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Do we have a plan B?
|
|
(...) Whew - I did get very seriously concerned on the rumours I had heard in various quarters on this topic. I think it is worth Suz making a very public Lugnet announcement to that affect to quash all the rumours and hearsay on this subject. (...) (19 years ago, 13-Aug-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Do we have a plan B?
|
|
(...) Hi Rosco, At Friday's Brickfest opening meeting, Suz announced that LUGNET will live, and will be administered by the gentleman that manages 1000Stein. This means that LUGNET *will* still be around, so until there are indications to the (...) (19 years ago, 13-Aug-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Do we have a plan B?
|
|
(...) I too hope that Lugnet continues. But I see no problem looking at options. Especially if you want time to get a solution of equal comfort :) I don't think it would hurt to investigate options, and maybe even create/install discussion software (...) (19 years ago, 11-Aug-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Do we have a plan B?
|
|
(...) I am also speaking for myself and not the SteerCo. I too want to stick with LUGNET. I have faith that it will survive and thrive. Change can make for upheaval, but we all deal with change in our lives all the time. I think LUGNET has a lot of (...) (19 years ago, 9-Aug-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: 2005 LDraw.org Standards Committee Vote Results
|
|
(...) Thanks to all for your good wishes! The LSC has not deliberated on this topic enough, but deliberation has officially started. I've made a motion that this be accepted as official. Once we have a second, we can discuss any issues that might (...) (19 years ago, 8-Aug-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: 2005 LDraw.org Standards Committee Vote Results
|
|
(...) c:\ongratulat.ion!!! bye, w. BTW. has the LSC ever deliberated upon the ldraw specification draft: (URL) (19 years ago, 8-Aug-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: 2005 LDraw.org Standards Committee Vote Results
|
|
(...) Congrats to the team! ROSCO (19 years ago, 5-Aug-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: 2005 LDraw.org Standards Committee Vote Results
|
|
(...) So that's what it's like to be an Ohioan! (...) =@= I have just received the following wire from my generous Daddy. It says, ''Dear Jack: Don't buy a single vote more than is necessary. I'll be damned if I am going to pay for a landslide.' (...) (19 years ago, 4-Aug-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 2005 LDraw.org Standards Committee Vote Results
|
|
(...) Woohoo! That makes me 7.6% of the electorate. I've never felt the caress of such unbridled power before. Oh, and congratulations to all the winners. Please send me those payoffs as we agreed before I voted. Dave! (19 years ago, 4-Aug-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: 2005 LDraw.org Standards Committee Vote Results
|
|
(...) Congratulations to all, I'm sure you'll do an excellent job and I look forward to any new developments in LDraw. Tim (19 years ago, 4-Aug-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | 2005 LDraw.org Standards Committee Vote Results
|
|
The 2005 LSC voting has come to an end. The 2005 LDraw.org Standards Committee is: Steve Bliss Kevin Clague Tore Eriksson Lars Hassing Orion Pobursky There were a total of 13 respondents. (19 years ago, 4-Aug-05, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: ...large project anyone?
|
|
(...) Hi Tim, May be you should get a try at LeoCAM, a LeoCad derivative incorporating LCD-like features: (URL) yours, - damien (19 years ago, 20-Jul-05, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.lcd, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Do we have a plan B?
|
|
(...) Just for the record, I agree with every single word of this. Especially the hating phpBB part :) (19 years ago, 20-Jul-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Do we have a plan B?
|
|
(...) Speaking for myself and not the SteerCo, I want to stick with LUGNET until the bitter end. I was dismayed when some of the other communities spun off discussion groups as I think this segregated the community further (and I hate phpBB which (...) (19 years ago, 20-Jul-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
