 | | .LDR file license (Was: Description of MLCad extensions...)
|
|
(...) Larry, sorry I didn't reply sooner but I was away on vacation. I guess everyone else must be too. Anyhow, I see you got my point. The whole reason for a parts license is to prevent new part authors from asserting arbitrary demands on the (...) (22 years ago, 22-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | numbers report - 16 July 2002
|
|
Stats for Unofficial Files 131 certified files. 165 files need admin review. 176 files need more votes. 258 have uncertified subfiles. 135 held files. For comparison: 2002-07-16 - 131 / 165 / 176 / 258 / 135 (865) 2002-07-10 - 123 / 163 / 172 / 258 (...) (22 years ago, 16-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | new feature for tracker?
|
|
Steve, I've got over 300 votes in the Tracker ("(URL) it's getting a little difficult to see what files I have _not_ voted on. How difficult would it be to code a "not reviewed" search function (i.e., the Boolean opposite of the "my reviews" (...) (22 years ago, 16-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Description of MLCad extensions available now
|
|
Ahui Herrera wrote: [ please consider quoting a little bit less in the future ] (...) I disagree. There is nothing wrong with enforcing his copyright to MLCAD as well as to the specification we are discussing, but I consider any attempt to enforce a (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Description of MLCad extensions available now
|
|
(...) I'm 1000% confused and really hate to admit it. I downloaded and read the extensions file but have NO CLUE what it's for? Can someone please let me what the extensions are for? Also Michael's approach with the license agreement is *NOT* bad (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Description of MLCad extensions available now
|
|
[ XFUT lugnet.cad.dev ] (...) Hmmm... I think I would advise all authors of LEGO CAD tools not to read the documentation for the MLCAD extensions to the LDraw syntax. If anybody happen to feel an urge to implement some MLCAD compatible extensions to (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Description of MLCad extensions available now
|
|
Let me just say before I get started here that I think Michael has made a terrific contribution to this community with MLCAD. I just think he's a bit confused about the ramifications of his license agreement and I hope we can clear it up. (...) I (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | numbers report - 10 July 2002
|
|
Stats for Unofficial Files 123 certified files. 163 files need admin review. 172 files need more votes. 258 have uncertified subfiles. 139 held files. For comparison: 2002-07-10 - 123 / 163 / 172 / 258 / 139 (855) 2002-07-02 - 095 / 171 / 193 / 230 (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Numbers Report - 2 July 2002
|
|
For comparison: 2002-07-02 - 095 / 171 / 193 / 230 / 132 (821) 2002-06-25 - 074 / 152 / 187 / 226 / 121 (760) 2002-06-08 - 085 / 073 / 261 / 219 / 094 (732) 2002-04-23 - 213 / 052 / 236 / 180 / 098 (779) 2002-04-14 - 141 / 057 / 224 / 243 / 094 (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Numbers Report - 2 July 2002
|
|
Stats for Unofficial Files 95 certified files. 171 files need admin review. 193 files need more votes. 230 have uncertified subfiles. 132 held files. (821 files total...) (22 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | MOTM and SOTM winners for June 2002
|
|
I'm actually up to speed on this one. :-) The Winner of LDraw.org's Model Of The Month is: Sven Moritz Hein and his spot-on version of a classic 911 sportscar. Wow. Sven has a load of goodies to see on his webpage, and on Brickshelf - check it out. (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jul-02, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw) !
|
| |
| | Re: Part Voting Issue
|
|
(...) By "hack", I just meant that someone could view the message page, save the HTML source to their hard drive, and modify the fields in the form to allow them to input userid and subject line. In order to use this hacked form, they'd still need (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Voting Issue
|
|
(...) Sounds good to me. If someone does hack it, we need to get it reported. Then we can disable it for awhile. Paul (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Voting Issue
|
|
(...) Yes, we would not display the destination email address, just the destination Parts Tracker userid. Good idea on the fixed subject line. Although it wouldn't be hard to hack the form, if the locking is just enforced by the HTML code. Steve (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Voting Issue
|
|
(...) I'd definitely want the destination address locked, probably not even displayed (just the name / user code), and a fixed subject line, too eg "Review of part xxxx", to disuade people from using it for anything other than PT email. ROSCO (22 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Voting Issue
|
|
(...) a (...) way (...) As a reviewer, I personally would not have a problem with this. Cheers, --Ryan Amateur radio call sign: kb1fob E-mail: ryanjf@ifriendly.com Website: (URL) (22 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: numbers report - 25 June 2002
|
|
(...) Gosh, no; I haven't thought about it at all. Steve (22 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Voting Issue
|
|
(...) I'm thinking of a simple system, where the PT will send an email on the behalf of a logged in user. One webpage, with just a few fields: ToUser (already filled in, maybe locked), Subject, and Message. Maybe with an "include my email address" (...) (22 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | [Parts Tracker] New Parts Admin!
|
|
Some of you sharp-eyed reviewers *might* have noticed this already... A few weeks ago, Chris Dee and I were emailing back and forth, and (if I remember right) he volunteered to help with admin type duties on the Parts Tracker. Because of various (...) (22 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw) !
|
| |
| | numbers report - 25 June 2002
|
|
"(URL) Totals 74 certified files. 152 files need admin review. <---[1] 187 files need more votes. 226 have uncertified subfiles. 121 held files. (760 files total...) [1]. Steve? Need some help? :-( Have you thought about recruiting some "jr." admins (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
