 | | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
|
|
Scott R Dennett <dennett@agate.net> wrote in message news:199906151254330...ate.net... (...) A*** Retentive, I assume. (...) But it has everything to do with inventorying the parts in a set, which is another plus of the LDraw file, and one of the (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
|
|
(...) LDLite do with a .txt file if it found it in an .mpd file? (...) I like this idea beter. LDAO and LDLite would pick it up and display it so people can read it if it was an errors.dat instead of errors.txt. -Tim Courtney ldraw.org Project (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
|
|
(...) each (...) of the (...) yet. (...) which is a Good (...) A/R?? (...) reason to have an (...) set (things (...) arms, etc. -- all (...) extra (...) And have you made a list of all those extra pieces, Todd? You can't expect people to do that on (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
|
|
(...) A/R?? (...) Good idea.. (...) Ok. (...) Wow! You have pointed out something very serious. Should there be things in the MPD splitters to catch something like that and not allow it to write to c:\ or c:\windows? -Tim Courtney ldraw.org Project (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
|
|
(...) That sounds like a really wise idea...and positively A/R, which is a Good Thing too. :-) And not only that (but related), there probably is a good reason to have an extras.dat file to codify the extra elements that come with a set (things like (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
