|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.574) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.574) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.574) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.573) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.573) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.573) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.573) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.573) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.573) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.573) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.573) |
|
| | Re: Undo/Redo Information META Tags? Or Options Buttons?
|
| (...) And I'm not sure this would be the optimal solution either. This options thing is more like a case switch than a series of if statements. (...) Thanks for your input, Kevin. I am looking for a friendly solution that won't output any code that (...) (15 years ago, 19-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.572) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.572) |
|
| | LDSwitch Sample #1: Do/Undo [DAT]
|
| Don't know if you prefer to make input here or at SourceForge, so I crosspost. Please give feedback where you like, here or at SF. Here's the first sample LDraw code snippet. Set the value of the variable Rev028_Changes to Do or Undo, run the (...) (15 years ago, 23-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.572) |
|
| | Re: number notation in official parts
|
| (...) I mostly agree with this policy. (...) There is nothing strange in the routines, it is the standard format used to represent very large or very small numbers in a limited number of digits. Actually since values never get very large in LDraw (...) (15 years ago, 11-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.570) |
|
| | Re: number notation in official parts
|
| (...) I definitely know this. I see them far too much in my job as a numerical physicist ;) My point is that to write in mixed format (some %f and others %e) requires some strange coding unless there is a weird language which does it automatically. (...) (15 years ago, 12-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.570) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.564) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.564) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.564) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.564) |