|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.796) |
|
| | Re: Ideas for next MOTM contest
|
| (...) (I hope you see this reply. Since it no longer has anything to do with ldraw.org, I moved it to the general dev group.) I'm guessing you mean moving out the near clip plane. This can indeed help a whole lot. I actually set the near and far (...) (20 years ago, 26-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.796) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.796) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.796) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.796) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.796) |
|
| | Contrubter Agreement v4
|
| The intent of the CA has changed. Please read the following poat for explanation: (URL) LDraw.org Steering Committee -*-*-*- Parts Library Contributor Agreement ---...--- Version: 4 (25-Jul-04) Submission Guidelines ---...--- By submitting work (...) (20 years ago, 29-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.796) |
|
| | Re: License Intent
|
| (...) Is a non commercial clause part of the SteerCo's intent? It wasn't mentioned in the initial post or in Larry's update. Could you clarify for me? Discounting the use of rendered parts in commercial products, eg. Larry selling ldraw rendered (...) (20 years ago, 4-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.796) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.796) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.796) |
|
| | Re: License Intent
|
| One thing I touched upon a while ago that may be useful, is creating an entirely NEW library, with the same format, and only adding primitives and parts as authors give their consent to the new licence. This would allow the current "complete" (...) (20 years ago, 25-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.796) |
|
| | Re: License Intent
|
| (...) Would it work if the license says that any future changes need author approval, but have a timeout? If after, say, 30 days of asking for approval (on ldraw, lugnet, and in email) there's no responce, the approval is assumed? Maybe 30 days is (...) (20 years ago, 4-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.796) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.796) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.795) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.795) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.795) |
|
| | Moving the License Forward
|
| Everyone - First I want to offer the Steering Committee's apologies for the delay in moving this issue forward. We've spent some time discussing the license and now we are ready to present a proposed solution for comments and feedback. After talking (...) (20 years ago, 11-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw) !!
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.795) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.795) |
|
| | LDraw Licence Call for Comments at Brickfest
|
| Links to the current LDraw Licence proposal: (URL) it seems as if the conversation regarding the licence has come to a standstill, we'd like to call for a final round of comments. We would like all LDraw contributers to air out their concerns, small (...) (20 years ago, 11-Aug-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.795) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.795) |