Subject:
|
Re: Parts with lengths (lsynth?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 9 Sep 2004 12:53:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1663 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Jindrich Kubec wrote:
> Steve Bliss wrote:
> > I don't think making a separate part file for every known length of a
> > part is the right approach, for at least two different reasons.
>
> i haven't suggested that.
>
> We don't have separate part file for every known color, but instead,
> there is part and color info in the dat. I think the length should be
> put in somewhat similar way in the dat, so that it could be easily
> extracted for inventory purposes.
You know, this did actually come up before in the context of lsynth.
This post from 2 years ago mentions LENGTH and UNITS options for
the lsynth meta commands.
http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dev/?n=8244
I think it's been mentioned since then as well. In my opinion that's
probably the best way to track the overall length of a hose part.
Is that what you were looking for? Perhaps it's time to revive the
discussion.
Don
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Parts with lengths
|
| (...) i haven't suggested that. We don't have separate part file for every known color, but instead, there is part and color info in the dat. I think the length should be put in somewhat similar way in the dat, so that it could be easily extracted (...) (20 years ago, 8-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
