Subject:
|
Re: Parts with lengths
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 8 Sep 2004 22:18:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1575 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote:
> I don't think making a separate part file for every known length of a part is
> the right approach, for at least two different reasons.
i haven't suggested that.
We don't have separate part file for every known color, but instead,
there is part and color info in the dat. I think the length should be
put in somewhat similar way in the dat, so that it could be easily
extracted for inventory purposes.
Jindroush
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Parts with lengths (lsynth?)
|
| (...) You know, this did actually come up before in the context of lsynth. This post from 2 years ago mentions LENGTH and UNITS options for the lsynth meta commands. (URL) think it's been mentioned since then as well. In my opinion that's probably (...) (20 years ago, 9-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | Re: Parts with lengths
|
| (...) Jindroush, True length is a topic that is near the top of the list for LSynth. Orion and I talked about it at BrickFest. There is at least one implementation out there by Frederick Glockner (using emacs) that supports true length. Since LSynth (...) (20 years ago, 9-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Parts with lengths
|
| (...) I don't think making a separate part file for every known length of a part is the right approach, for at least two different reasons. First, it would significantly increase the number of parts in the LDraw library, making it that much harder (...) (20 years ago, 7-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
