To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 8663
8662  |  8664
Subject: 
Re: New BFC Spec
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 02:17:41 GMT
Viewed: 
652 times
  
Travis & All -
What's the status on this? Is there a document we can call 'final' or final
enough to post on the site? If so, could one of you do me a HUGE favor of
going throug the paragraphs and separating them like this?

<p>
paragraph.
</p>

<p>
paragraph
</p>

etc... with the space inbetween, so they're easy to visually separate? If
someone does that, I can go in and add the CSS styles to the headers and
code blocks and such, then add it to LDraw.org. Thanks!

-Tim

In lugnet.cad.dev, Travis Cobbs writes:
I have created an updated revision of the BFC spec, available from the
following location:

http://www.halibut.com/~tcobbs/ldraw/bfcspecv11.txt

To create this file, I started with bfcspecv4.txt (which was actually
revision 10), then remarked every line in the file to be revision 10, then
made my modifications as revision 11.  (The reasons behind this were
discussed in the other BFC thread.)  Consequently, all my modifications are
listed as being revision 11, and everything else in the file is nearly 3
years old.  I added a revision notes section that details my changes and
deletions (since deletions don't show up).

If people are comfortable with this version, I will reformat it in a way
similar to what Orion did with the last one, and send the file to Tim to be
added to the ldraw.org specifications page.  I feel that both a
revision-marked, and a nicely formatted version should be available from
ldraw.org, but that's just my personal opinion based on comments people made
in the other major recent BFC thread.  If Tim agrees, he can add both
versions to ldraw.org.

Note when I say "comfortable", I don't mean you don't have any suggested
changes.  I just mean that you consider my version to be acceptable for the
moment.  I think ultimately Steve Bliss has final say, though.

--Travis Cobbs (tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com)



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: New BFC Spec
 
(...) Sorry about the delay. I made most of the changes that Steve suggested, along with a few others, and posted both a line-number-annotated .txt version and an html version. The html version can be found here: (URL) still not 100% complete, I (...) (21 years ago, 6-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  New BFC Spec
 
I have created an updated revision of the BFC spec, available from the following location: (URL) create this file, I started with bfcspecv4.txt (which was actually revision 10), then remarked every line in the file to be revision 10, then made my (...) (21 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

10 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR