 | | Re: vote 9902
|
|
here is my thoughts on the part numbers... i know that the numver 7xxxx assigned to the harpoon for example refers specificly to the chromed version but if TLG releases it in say blue whos to say that they will not decide to use the same number? we (...) (26 years ago, 27-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: parts DESPERATLY wanted (steve: please read)
|
|
(...) Sure. They should be available in the next update. Until then, you can easily substitute available parts. (...) Nope. I don't have that part, so I can't model it. (...) Now there's an incentive. (...) A mess. (...) If I get some time, I will (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Studs
|
|
I've been 'testing' the CyberMaster version of the Electric Touch Sensor in POV-Ray and noticed a few details: I don't know if the contacts of the studs where yellow in some time in the past, but nowadays they are silver. Maybe they could should be (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New Touch Sensor [DAT]
|
|
-----Original message----- From: Laurentino Martins <lau@mail.telepac.pt> To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Date: vrijdag 26 maart 1999 15:40 subject: Re: New Touch Sensor I've noticed I've made a mistake, the line in file (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New Touch Sensor [DAT]
|
|
-----Original message----- From: Laurentino Martins <lau@mail.telepac.pt> To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Date: vrijdag 26 maart 1999 15:40 subject: Re: New Touch Sensor (...) This is a known problem with dithered colours: (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: A solution to the part numbering problem? (Was: vote 9902)
|
|
-----Original message----- From: Selçuk <teyyareci> <sgore@nospam.superonline.com> To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Datum: vrijdag 26 maart 1999 16:12 Onderwerp: Re: A solution to the part numbering problem? (Was: vote 9902) (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Complete list of metacommands?
|
|
I am trying to get a complete list of the type 0 metacommands and this is what I currently have, if people can let me know the ones that I am missing that would be fantastic. Standard LDraw metacommands (see (URL) STEP - Marks the end of the (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: problem with JJ Memorial
|
|
(...) I've maintained a local copy of the original archives on my mirror for the l-cad parts updates for a long time now. (URL) yesterday morning with the new 9902 update and the new complete.exe (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: parts DESPERATLY wanted (steve: please read)
|
|
(...) When my kinfolk (1) try this trick on me, they very quickly find themselves in a different room (or if I can help it, a different building) from where I am. They have learned that this tactic of begging brings exactly the opposite of what they (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw part update 9902
|
|
(...) I agree, and I also want to extend a Thank You to Todd, Terry, Steve, Leo and others too numerous to mention for their generous contributions to the LEGO community. It is frusterating sometimes to have to wait for the latest update in any (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: A solution to the part numbering problem? (Was: vote 9902)
|
|
Wow...How nice. I really like this idea. I have been always behind the idea of separating those two universe, but couldn't realise that they could be both "separate" and "together" at the same time. Nice and elegant solution in my side. What's you (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: vote 9902
|
|
Terrel, I'm sorry that I forgotten to mention in my last message, but if has any use for anyone (from misunderstanding point of view) I never intended to blame anyone, especially you. I believe you have the one having one of the greatest portions (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New Touch Sensor
|
|
(...) IMHO this numbering method makes no sense at all !! First, the 3 parts are not separable and makes no sense using them separated. LEGO decided to number them like if it was a _single_ part and have put the 32025 number in the _main_ part which (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw part update 9902
|
|
-----Original message----- From: Terry K <legoverse@geocities.com> To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com>; lugnet.cad@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad@lugnet.com> Date: vrijdag 26 maart 1999 3:23 Subject: LDraw part update 9902 Terry, I've (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | A solution to the part numbering problem? (Was: vote 9902)
|
|
(...) What about adding a "reference" catalog to the LDraw tree? It should be used for LDraw files with _exact_ part-number relations. The name could be "LDraw\LEGO", "LDraw\Official", or "LDraw\Reference" (the last is too long). Parts like the six (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: vote 9902
|
|
(...) Right now there is nothing "wrong" with the part, per se. The part number (71427) refers to a specific color for that composite item. The part is not actually any color - it is in #16. Right now, you could use that part as-is. The number is a (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: vote 9902
|
|
I am truly sorry that we are going through this problem. But LDraw is a dual purpose program. The original purpose, and one that is still valid, useful, and needed, is that of a parts reference. A parts reference that depends on using TLG part (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: vote 9902
|
|
So, nothing could be more clear than this example. As I said before, Continuing to follow TLG naming scheme causes problems. Always. Is it a nice thing to put some already done and meet the quality requirements parts on hold, just because they are (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.cad.dev (1999.03.24.1000) #794-799 (6 articles)
|
|
(...) ^^^...^^^ Tim: PLEASE don't reply directly to digest messages -- when you do so, you destroy the subject line as well as References headers crucial for proper article threading. As stated near the top of each digest message: To reply to a (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: vote 9902
|
|
o.k. but what is wrong with the 9v motor? it is the correct color and the correct number? is there something wrong with the piece? (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
