 | | Re: What's up with box3#8.dat? (was: BFC parts with BFC-less primitives) —Niels Karsdorp
|
| | | (...) Another suggestion is using the dash '-' and have an additional letter give some more information. a = adjacent p = parallel ... (more?) Niels (22 years ago, 21-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: What's up with box3#8.dat? (was: BFC parts with BFC-less primitives) —Chris Dee
|
| | | | (...) There already is a 'p' suffix meaning parallel - the primitive is actually named box3#8p.dat. I found the original text from Manfred (dated 16Oct1998) copied here with minor spelling corrections - note that Manfred uses the word 'rib' for (...) (22 years ago, 21-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What's up with box3#8.dat? (was: BFC parts with BFC-less primitives) —Niels Karsdorp
|
| | | | (...) : is not ok for MS-DOS! (It is used to after the drive name, like C: (...) Sound good to me Niels (22 years ago, 21-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | New primitive box3-2.dat (was Re: What's up with box3#8.dat?) —Niels Karsdorp
|
| | | | Still no answer on the box primitive naming conventions. For my spoked wheels I needed a new primitive, like the box3#8.dat but with all adjecent edges. I named it box3-2.dat (Box, 3 faces drawn, 2 edges left out), but how should I name it so I can (...) (22 years ago, 29-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New primitive box3-2.dat (was Re: What's up with box3#8.dat?) —Chris Dee
|
| | | | (...) Patience please - it's the holiday season and some of us have families to consider. I was hoping to get more replies to (URL) I explained the naming convention as currently implemented. So, if no-one is bothered, I'll change box3#8p.dat to (...) (22 years ago, 29-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New primitive box3-2.dat (was Re: What's up with box3#8.dat?) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | Chris, I'm alright with the 'u' convention. It'd be wicked cool if someone sat down and figured out all the possible box configurations (there can't be *that* many of them), so we could have a clearer idea of what we're trying to describe. Then (...) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New primitive box3-2.dat (was Re: What's up with box3#8.dat?) —Niels Karsdorp
|
| | | | (...) I'll have patience. These dull and rainy holidays in the Netherlands are ideal to do some part authoring ;-) Yes I have families to consider, too. My grandparents celebrated their 84th and 85th birthdays. And I could borrow some old parts my (...) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New primitive box3-2.dat (was Re: What's up with box3#8.dat?) —Chris Dee
|
| | | | (...) I have moved the box3#8p.dat currently on the Parts Tracker to box3u8p.dat and the new primitive is available to review at (URL) ~Moved to file will need special attention by Steve and I as it is not accessible through the review machanism, (...) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
