Subject:
|
Re: When Did Tiles Get Their Groove?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 1 Aug 2002 18:43:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
567 times
|
| |
|
|
On 20 Dec 2001, in lugnet.cad.dev, Bram Lambrecht writes:
> Chris Dee writes:
> > The only decorated tile without a finger groove that I know
> > of is the 2x2 with a large black disk (3068P17). This came
> > from the Homemaker set 263 dated 1974. I've no idea whether
> > this _also_ exists with a finger groove.
>
> If this is the same pattern:
> http://www.brickshelf.com/scans/6000/6351/6351-09.html
> then, yes, it does exist with a finger groove.
Due to this information, I have deleted the unofficial, "~Moved to 3068bp17"
version of 3068p17.dat from Parts Tracker. And I changed the title of
3068bp17.dat to "Tile 2 x 2 Grooved with Black Circle Pattern".
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: When Did Tiles Get Their Groove?
|
| (...) Isn't the style for the other grooved tiles "with Groove", not "Grooved"? I think it would make more sense to call the other one "Tile 2 x 2 with Black Circle Pattern without Groove", since a) the grooveless tiles are more "exotic" and b) as a (...) (22 years ago, 1-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
