To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 7543
7542  |  7544
Subject: 
Re: When Did Tiles Get Their Groove?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Thu, 1 Aug 2002 18:43:55 GMT
Viewed: 
532 times
  
On 20 Dec 2001, in lugnet.cad.dev, Bram Lambrecht writes:
Chris Dee writes:
The only decorated tile without a finger groove that I know
of is the 2x2 with a large black disk (3068P17). This came
from the Homemaker set 263 dated 1974. I've no idea whether
this _also_ exists with a finger groove.

If this is the same pattern:
http://www.brickshelf.com/scans/6000/6351/6351-09.html
then, yes, it does exist with a finger groove.

Due to this information, I have deleted the unofficial, "~Moved to 3068bp17"
version of 3068p17.dat from Parts Tracker.  And I changed the title of
3068bp17.dat to "Tile  2 x  2 Grooved with Black Circle Pattern".

Steve



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: When Did Tiles Get Their Groove?
 
(...) Isn't the style for the other grooved tiles "with Groove", not "Grooved"? I think it would make more sense to call the other one "Tile 2 x 2 with Black Circle Pattern without Groove", since a) the grooveless tiles are more "exotic" and b) as a (...) (22 years ago, 1-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  RE: When Did Tiles Get Their Groove?
 
(...) If this is the same pattern: (URL) yes, it does exist with a finger groove. --Bram Bram Lambrecht bram@cwru.edu www.bldesign.org (23 years ago, 20-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)

12 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR