Subject:
|
RE: When Did Tiles Get Their Groove?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 20 Dec 2001 22:29:55 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
<bram@po.=NoSpam=cwru.edu>
|
Viewed:
|
561 times
|
| |
|
|
Chris Dee writes:
> The only decorated tile without a finger groove that I know
> of is the 2x2 with a large black disk (3068P17). This came
> from the Homemaker set 263 dated 1974. I've no idea whether
> this _also_ exists with a finger groove.
If this is the same pattern:
http://www.brickshelf.com/scans/6000/6351/6351-09.html
then, yes, it does exist with a finger groove.
--Bram
Bram Lambrecht
bram@cwru.edu
www.bldesign.org
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: When Did Tiles Get Their Groove?
|
| (...) Due to this information, I have deleted the unofficial, "~Moved to 3068bp17" version of 3068p17.dat from Parts Tracker. And I changed the title of 3068bp17.dat to "Tile 2 x 2 Grooved with Black Circle Pattern". Steve (22 years ago, 1-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: When Did Tiles Get Their Groove?
|
| (...) The only decorated tile without a finger groove that I know of is the 2x2 with a large black disk (3068P17). This came from the Homemaker set 263 dated 1974. I've no idea whether this _also_ exists with a finger groove. Chris (23 years ago, 20-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
