 | | Re: L3P and/or L3PAO —Lars C. Hassing
|
| | | (...) Would that solve all your problems? You always want to ignore steps in submodels when rendering main model? Do you render submodels separately for BI ? /Lars (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: L3P and/or L3PAO —Ahui Herrera
|
| | | | (...) It would be a solution. Basically in the end I would have 2 set of files: Set 1: for distribution model.mpd (which is made of) complete.ldr submodel1.ldr submodel2.ldr Note that ALL of these files would have their steps IN THEM! So that a user (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: L3P and/or L3PAO —Lars C. Hassing
|
| | | | Ahui Herrera wrote... (...) I think we have been talking past each other, especially about what a submodel is, and when it is a submodel. You seem to think of a submodel as being a certain file, and always call it submodel no matter it is rendered (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: L3P and/or L3PAO —Ahui Herrera
|
| | | | (...) Yes I only REALLY need set 1, Set 2 is just to make the builing instructions, move stuff around and ensure that all is okay but it never gets distributed. (...) Yes.. in some case all 'submodels - files referenced by compelete.ldr show up) and (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: L3P and/or L3PAO —Lars C. Hassing
|
| | | | (...) Indeed, this is exactly why I am going to change the functionality of -sc! (...) - then rendering with "l3p -sc complete.ldr" will get you the following: Step 1: all of Pillars.ldr Step 2: all of Pillars.ldr and MainFloor.ldr Step 3: all of (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: L3P and/or L3PAO —Ahui Herrera
|
| | | | (...) Thank you, thank you, thank you!!!! =) Ahui (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
