Subject:
|
Re: Issue with some of the holds on the Parts Tracker
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 11 Jun 2002 18:03:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
464 times
|
| |
|
|
This post wasn't directed at you specifically, it's been brewing for some
time now. Actually, the holds you put on today were more or less justified
but the hold I've seen in the past have sometime bordered on the ridiculous.
-Orion
(make it billthefish and remove the obvious lettering to reply personally)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Issue with some of the holds on the Parts Tracker
|
| (...) Hi reviewers, May be the post was also directed to me. I plainly assume some of my votes to be honest but ridiculous or arbitrary. In absence of a formal specification of what is a good part, voting is arbitrary in essence. In presence of such (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Issue with some of the holds on the Parts Tracker
|
| Hello Orion, I think you may refer to some hold votes i did today. (...) I would never hold a part because of some bad vertex sequences only. But identical lines are a reason for doing this. Refer to the parts tracker documentation for L3P-error (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
