Subject:
|
Re: Issue with some of the holds on the Parts Tracker
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 05:43:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
786 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Damien Guichard writes:
> I have posted a comment on ...
Comments are always welcome over holding for insignificant errors. I try to
check all the parts I've submitted at least ever couple days until
certified, I really wish more part authors would check up on their parts
regularly. OTOH, if you post a comment that isn't a hold or certfy, I
would also like an email as these comments can get by me.
-Orion
(make it billthefish and remove the obvious lettering to reply personally)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Issue with some of the holds on the Parts Tracker
|
| (...) Hi reviewers, May be the post was also directed to me. I plainly assume some of my votes to be honest but ridiculous or arbitrary. In absence of a formal specification of what is a good part, voting is arbitrary in essence. In presence of such (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
