Subject:
|
Re: Issue with some of the holds on the Parts Tracker
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 11 Jun 2002 17:28:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
386 times
|
| |
|
|
Hello Orion,
I think you may refer to some hold votes i did today.
> -Holding a non-BFC part simply because it has bad vertex sequences. While
> this may be bad coding form, a certify vote and a warning would suffice
I would never hold a part because of some bad vertex sequences only. But
identical lines are a reason for doing this.
Refer to the parts tracker documentation for L3P-error codes and reasons for
a hold vore. But if I see the second one (identical lines) I will mention
the first one too even it isn't the reason for the hold.
> -*Very* small quad overlaps/gaps in patterned pieces that only show up in
> deep zooming. Will errors like this ever really be seen?
I think these small errors and gaps are easy to remove and it wouldn't be a
big deal for anyone to do it.
I only held one file today that was already certified by Steve and that
pattern had a comparable big hole in the front that was easy to overlook
against the background.
I see these errors without deep-in zooming. I'm using LDView with its
standard zooming settings. And if i notice an error at that zoom level I'm
not willing to certify that part because it a visual error by all means. Any
other way the parts tracker would be ad absurdum.
I know you are doing good parts.... but (no offense) the parts tracker is
for reviewing parts and eventually corrrection of the errors.
Play well
Carsten
p.s.: If there is any problem with one of my review you or anyone else can
always email to me personally. I will be of help if i can and even give you
the hints how to correct an eventual problem.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Issue with some of the holds on the Parts Tracker
|
| This post wasn't directed at you specifically, it's been brewing for some time now. Actually, the holds you put on today were more or less justified but the hold I've seen in the past have sometime bordered on the ridiculous. -Orion (make it (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Issue with some of the holds on the Parts Tracker
|
| I am at issue with some the hold votes that have given to parts on the PT. As the certify statement says, a part is certified if it is good for general release. In other words, we're not looking for absolute perfection, we are looking for a part (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
