 | | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw —Karim Nassar
|
| | | (...) I agree wholeheartedly... The point I tried to make earlier, was that it seems that by giveing seperate part numbers to the part, TLG is leaveing open the possibility in the future to release a part that is in two SEPARATE colors. So, my (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw —Jeff Boen
|
| | | | (...) that (...) possibility (...) question (...) great point.. and well thought-out... hmmmm... okay... so then as i see it we have two options.. #1 (my preference, since this is how we handle two halves of every hinge, wheel-tyre combo, etc.. (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Just to be a pain: there are existing 'glued-together' parts in LDraw with sub-files for each component part and a main short-cut file for the whole thing. Two that spring to mind are the 2x2x11 pillar and the classic 2x4 plate hinge. (...) (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw —Jeff Boen
|
| | | | (...) hehe.. i can always count on you to be a pain, steve... :) every morning i come in here and check this thread and i can see everyone's point with equal value... i started in on this convo from the standpoint of "2 #16 parts, then aggregate (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw —Terry Keller
|
| | | | (...) True. As the best way to keep everyone at least somewhat happy. (...) I don't want to over-use 3-digit numbers. Only where necessary and unavoidable. For instance; The complete yellow dinghy does have the correct number. So we can make a (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
