 | | Democracy (Was: next parts vote/update - when???)
|
|
What about a little less democracy? Like in the days when James was the obvious Leader. Let's say one trusted authority, Steve, Lars, anyone-else? looks at the part one at the time. Parts with obvious flaws set aside. Then run L3P -check and exclude (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Democracy (Was: next parts vote/update - when???)
|
|
"Tore Eriksson" <tore.eriksson@mbox3...wipnet.se> wrote in message news:3A77FB68.4FD03E...pnet.se... (...) obvious Leader. Let's say one trusted authority, (...) obvious flaws set aside. Then run L3P -check and (...) officialize those that passed (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Democracy (Was: next parts vote/update - when???)
|
|
(...) Almost all aspects of a part can be brushed upon later, should a faulty part be officialized. Bow-tie quads, syntax errors, header errors and bad names. All can easily be fixed later on. There is one aspect, however, which simply cannot be (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Democracy (Was: next parts vote/update - when???)
|
|
(...) Um, me too. It's extremely frustrating to work with some parts in the library due to these inconsistencies -- immediate examples include <part:30079> and several minifig accessories, not to mention the goofy assortment of rotation axes among (...) (24 years ago, 12-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Democracy (Was: next parts vote/update - when???)
|
|
(...) Has this been suggested before: I understand that altering a zero point or rotation orientation will break models. But what if a new part were assigned at that time, and the old number referenced the new number (with appropriate transformation (...) (24 years ago, 12-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
