 | | Re: More parts feedback —Steve Bliss
|
| | | (...) 2637 should be renamed to something like 2637.DAT Technic Axle 16 with End Links 2637.DAT Technic Axle 16 with Holes 2637.DAT Technic Axle 16 with End Connectors Steve (25 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: More parts feedback —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | | (...) This sounds like a very good idea. It will also make it easier to include the Technic Linkage part which comes with the Y-wing. (8 of them in every Y-wing, don't know just how long they are.) Here's one more suggestion as to the title: (...) (25 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: More parts feedback —Karim Nassar
|
| | | | | | (...) Ah, I understand :) (...) In this case, it seems that a use-specific name such as: "Technic Tie Rod" might be appropriate, since even if one doesn't use this part as a steering linkage, the "specific" term "tie-rod" is actually generic enough (...) (25 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: More parts feedback —Terry Keller
|
| | | | (...) I agree with that. It would be a lot more sensible. And I like the original names for the Link Chain/Tread pieces. So, what do we like? with End Links / Holes / End Connectors? Or is there a nomenclature even more apt out there? -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 6-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: More parts feedback —Kim Toll
|
| | | | | Terry K wrote in message <36e0b4c1.2353492@lu...et.com>... (...) The problem with "Holes" is that it is used for many things and is only marginally descriptive. How about something like one of the following: 2637.DAT Technic Axle 16 with End Pin (...) (25 years ago, 6-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: More parts feedback —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | (...) Me too. If we stick to "3873.DAT Technic Chain Tread" now, we can always add "0.6 x 2.6" later if there appears a new tread link later, can we not? (...) Out of the three, I prefer 2637.DAT Technic Axle 16 with End Connectors because the part (...) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
