 | | Re: File Naming Protocol for Patterned Parts —Chris Dee
|
| | | (...) Rather than the suggestion of using alpha characters, in the "pattern number", have we considered allowing other characters in the sixth position - so we allow nnnnnp00-nnnnnp99 nnnnnq00-nnnnnq99, nnnnnr00-nnnnnr99, etc as valid patterned part (...) (24 years ago, 21-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: File Naming Protocol for Patterned Parts —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | Forward: I'd rather stick with using P as the patterned-element designator. Add letters to the suffix, to allow up to 1296 patterns per part. If this is not enough, then define another letter-designator in addition to the P. If we get 1500 patterns (...) (24 years ago, 21-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: File Naming Protocol for Patterned Parts —Chris Dee
|
| | | | | | (...) number", (...) OK - point taken - and based on this well-reasoned argument I am happy to go with the pXX nomenclature. I feel a little uneasy about the possible conflict between the first and third usages - with the benefit of hindsight might (...) (24 years ago, 21-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: File Naming Protocol for Patterned Parts —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) I started thinking about the potential conflict while I was composing the list. But I'd rather use (a, b, c, ...) suffixes (suffices? suffii?) for usage #1, to keep those ID numbers as short as possible--we're already seeing the effect of a (...) (24 years ago, 22-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: File Naming Protocol for Patterned Parts —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | This is a proposal for a new meta-statement/header line for parts files. I'm hanging this off the pattern-id discussion, because it relates to patterned parts. The basic idea is this: right now, there are three ways to see if there is a relation (...) (24 years ago, 21-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: File Naming Protocol for Patterned Parts —Franklin W. Cain
|
| | | | (...) Interesting. I like the idea. One (semi-related) thought, though... *Where* are all these meta-statements documented? Is the location/URL of this documentation readily available to *new* (or forgetful) LCAD authors? Lately, I answered several (...) (24 years ago, 21-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: File Naming Protocol for Patterned Parts —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) We're working on more FAQ material. (...) If anyone wants Franklin's help (he's enthusiastic and prolific! :), be sure to drop him a line. Steve (24 years ago, 22-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
