To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 5597
5596  |  5598
Subject: 
Re: File Naming Protocol for Patterned Parts
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Tue, 21 Nov 2000 15:45:46 GMT
Viewed: 
612 times
  
This is a proposal for a new meta-statement/header line for parts files.

I'm hanging this off the pattern-id discussion, because it relates to
patterned parts.

The basic idea is this: right now, there are three ways to see if there is
a relation between two part files.  The first way (for patterned parts) is
to look for a pppp.dat file to go with a ppppPxx.dat file.  The second way
(for shortcut files) is to parse the shortcut file, and find the file(s)
referenced in the linetype 1 command(s).  The third way is to look for
similar descriptive part names.  If a part has the title "bbbbbbbbbbb with
yyyyy Pattern", there should be another part-file with title "bbbbbbbbbbb".

There should be a meta-statement which provides a simple, clear way to
relate one part-file to another part-file.

There are a couple of types of parts which could benefit from this
information.  One type is patterned parts.  Another type is the TLC
official number shortcut files.

The meta-statement would look like this:

0 BASE[:] <type> <base-part>

This meta-statement would appear in the header of certain parts which are
derived from another part.  Only one meta-statement would appear in a
single part-file, and it could only reference one parent part.  This would
allow for many derived parts to reference a single base part.

Any reactions to this?

Steve



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: File Naming Protocol for Patterned Parts
 
(...) Interesting. I like the idea. One (semi-related) thought, though... *Where* are all these meta-statements documented? Is the location/URL of this documentation readily available to *new* (or forgetful) LCAD authors? Lately, I answered several (...) (24 years ago, 21-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: File Naming Protocol for Patterned Parts
 
(...) Rather than the suggestion of using alpha characters, in the "pattern number", have we considered allowing other characters in the sixth position - so we allow nnnnnp00-nnnnnp99 nnnnnq00-nnnnnq99, nnnnnr00-nnnnnr99, etc as valid patterned part (...) (24 years ago, 21-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)

7 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR