 | | Another license draft —Leonardo Zide
|
| | | Hi, After some more dicussion, I have come to the following proposal for the license. It's much simpler than Steve's first license but I think it covers all important points. I have also copied some parts of the GPL text because I think they are (...) (24 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev) !
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Another license draft —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | I have some issues, mostly minor, one major. (...) Which is who? This needs to be addressed somewhere. (...) Minor issue: strike ".", add "and the various programs and systems of datamodels that allow Computer Aided Design (creation) of (...) (24 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Another license draft —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | Sorry it's taken me so long to get back to this -- I've been too busy to really dig into it. Overall, I think this is a decent *redistribution* license. It does not address: 1. The agreement(s) between the contributors and ldraw.org. 2. The fact (...) (24 years ago, 4-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Another license draft —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | In lugnet.cad.dev, Steve Bliss writes: <snip> I got swamped and it took me a week to get another look. Wow, that was bad. I guess we have to try to wrap this up before we all forget to keep pushing. Where are we at now? No one addressed my points (...) (24 years ago, 12-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Another license draft —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | (...) I'm planning on updating the main page of the site with a paragraph or two about the license drafting, with links to the threads on Lugnet. All I gotta do now is write it and figure out MindTerm to access the server (there's been some (...) (24 years ago, 15-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Another license draft —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Cool. One advantage to having ldraw.org 'memberships' would be the ability of users to provide feedback on software. Especially the ratings. Comments would be nice, but I'd want comments to be reviewed (not necessarily by the software authors) (...) (24 years ago, 16-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Another license draft —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | "Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@home.com> wrote in message news:9c7mus8sotnsd35...4ax.com... (...) ability (...) Well, its up to Dan how much he's willing to put into it. I'm greatful for what we're getting right now - an easy way to manage software and (...) (24 years ago, 16-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Another license draft —Jeff Boen
|
| | | | | (...) I second that... I feel a little funny rating my own apps... after all, if I didn't think it was a 5, I wouldn't have taken the time to write it... but that doesn't mean it stacks up in importance or quality compared to other programs. J (24 years ago, 17-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Another license draft —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) That's fine -- keep the membership/feedback idea for later. (...) I was thinking more of memberships for people who would include themselves in 'the organization known as ldraw.org', not all LDraw users. But, whatever. :) Steve (24 years ago, 17-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
